Common tasks
Step-by-step guides you can copy and adapt.
Tip: Run
napt <command> --helpfor options and examples, e.g.napt discover --help.
Initialize a new NAPT project
Quick setup
# Create and enter project directory
mkdir my-intune-packages
cd my-intune-packages
# Initialize NAPT project structure
napt init
Output:
$ napt init
Initializing NAPT project in: /path/to/my-intune-packages
[1/2] Creating directory structure...
[2/2] Creating configuration files...
======================================================================
INITIALIZATION RESULTS
======================================================================
Project Root: /path/to/my-intune-packages
Created (4):
[OK] recipes/
[OK] defaults/vendors/
[OK] state/deployment/
[OK] defaults/org.yaml
======================================================================
[SUCCESS] Project initialized!
What gets created
my-intune-packages/
├── defaults/
│ ├── org.yaml # Organization-wide defaults (commented template)
│ └── vendors/ # Vendor-specific overrides (empty)
├── recipes/ # Your recipe files go here
└── state/
└── deployment/ # Per-app deployment state (written by discover, upload, promote)
Handling existing files
NAPT safely skips existing files by default:
$ napt init
Initializing NAPT project in: /path/to/existing-project
[1/2] Creating directory structure...
[2/2] Creating configuration files...
======================================================================
INITIALIZATION RESULTS
======================================================================
Project Root: /path/to/existing-project
Skipped (4):
[SKIP] recipes/
[SKIP] defaults/vendors/
[SKIP] state/deployment/
[SKIP] defaults/org.yaml
======================================================================
Note: Existing files were preserved. Use --force to overwrite.
[SUCCESS] Project initialized!
To overwrite existing files (with automatic backup):
This backs up defaults/org.yaml before replacing it (directories are never
touched):
$ napt init --force
Initializing NAPT project in: /path/to/existing-project
[1/2] Creating directory structure...
[2/2] Creating configuration files...
======================================================================
INITIALIZATION RESULTS
======================================================================
Project Root: /path/to/existing-project
Created (1):
[OK] defaults/org.yaml
Backed Up (1):
[OK] defaults/org.yaml -> org.yaml.backup
Skipped (3):
[SKIP] recipes/
[SKIP] defaults/vendors/
[SKIP] state/deployment/
======================================================================
[SUCCESS] Project initialized!
Next steps after init
-
Edit organization defaults (optional):
-
Create your first recipe:
-
Validate and test:
Create a recipe for a GitHub release app
Use this when the application is hosted on GitHub with releases.
Example: Git for Windows
- Create the recipe file:
# recipes/Git/git.yaml
apiVersion: napt/v1
name: "Git for Windows"
id: "napt-git"
discovery:
strategy: api_github
repo: "git-for-windows/git"
asset_pattern: "Git-.*-64-bit\\.exe$"
version_pattern: "v?([0-9.]+)\\.windows"
intune:
detection:
display_name: "Git"
architecture: "x64"
psadt:
app_vars:
AppName: "Git for Windows"
AppVersion: "{{discovered_version}}"
install: |
Start-ADTProcess -FilePath "Git-{{discovered_version}}-64-bit.exe" -ArgumentList "/VERYSILENT /NORESTART"
uninstall: |
Uninstall-ADTApplication -Name "Git"
- Validate the recipe:
- Test discovery:
What to customize:
- repo: GitHub repository (owner/repo format)
- asset_pattern: Regex to match the installer filename
- version_pattern: Regex to extract version from tag
- install/uninstall: PowerShell deployment scripts
Create a recipe for a vendor download page
Use this when the vendor has a download page listing installers (no API available).
Example: 7-Zip
- Create the recipe file:
# recipes/7-Zip/7zip-x64-msi.yaml
apiVersion: napt/v1
name: "7-Zip (x64) MSI"
id: "napt-7zip-x64-msi"
discovery:
strategy: web_scrape
page_url: "https://www.7-zip.org/download.html"
link_selector: 'a[href$="-x64.msi"]'
version_pattern: "7z(\\d{2})(\\d{2})-x64"
version_format: "{0}.{1}"
intune:
detection:
display_name: "7-Zip * (x64 edition)" # Wildcard matches any 7-Zip x64 version
override_msi_display_name: true # Override MSI ProductName which includes version
psadt:
app_vars:
AppName: "7-Zip"
AppVersion: "{{discovered_version}}"
Install/uninstall commands are auto-generated for MSI:
- No
psadt.install/psadt.uninstallneeded - NAPT generatesStart-ADTMsiProcess -Action Installwith the exact downloaded filename (plusALLUSERS=1for system deployments) andUninstall-ADTApplicationmatching the MSI's ProductName exactly - Uninstall survives ProductCode changes - Matching is by name, not ProductCode, and the name is re-extracted from each downloaded MSI
-
Custom commands - Set
psadt.override_msi_commands: trueand provide your owninstall/uninstall(e.g., for MST transforms or extra MSI properties) -
Validate and test:
napt validate recipes/7-Zip/7zip-x64-msi.yaml
napt discover recipes/7-Zip/7zip-x64-msi.yaml --verbose
What to customize:
page_url: Vendor download page URLlink_selector: CSS selector to find the download linkversion_pattern: Regex to extract version from URLversion_format: Format string to transform version (optional)intune.detection: Configure when vendor includes version in DisplayName (e.g., "7-Zip 25.01")display_name: Pattern with wildcards to match the installed app nameoverride_msi_display_name: Set totrueto override MSI's versioned DisplayName
Create a recipe for a JSON API endpoint
Use this when the vendor provides a JSON API with version and download URL.
Example: Generic JSON API
- Create the recipe file:
# recipes/Vendor/app.yaml
apiVersion: napt/v1
name: "Application Name"
id: "napt-app"
discovery:
strategy: api_json
api_url: "https://api.vendor.com/latest"
version_path: "version" # JSONPath to version field (e.g., "version" or "data.version")
download_url_path: "download_url"
version_pattern: "v?([0-9.]+)" # Optional: narrow the version value with a regex
headers: # Optional HTTP headers (e.g., for authentication)
Authorization: "Bearer ${API_TOKEN}"
psadt:
app_vars:
AppName: "Application Name"
AppVersion: "{{discovered_version}}"
install: |
Start-ADTProcess -FilePath "{{installer_filename}}" -ArgumentList "/S"
uninstall: |
Uninstall-ADTApplication -Name "Application Name"
-
Set the token in your environment (see Handle authentication tokens).
-
Validate and test:
What to customize:
api_url: JSON API endpoint URLversion_path: JSONPath to version field (e.g., "version" or "data.version")download_url_path: JSONPath to download URL fieldheaders: Optional authentication headers
Create a recipe for an MSIX installer
Use this when the application distributes an .msix installer. NAPT extracts
metadata from AppxManifest.xml and auto-generates install/uninstall commands.
Example: Slack (MSIX via JSON API)
- Create the recipe file:
# recipes/Slack/slack.yaml
apiVersion: napt/v1
name: "Slack"
id: "napt-slack"
discovery:
strategy: api_json
api_url: "https://slack.com/api/desktop.latestRelease?arch=x64&variant=msix&redirect=false"
version_path: "version"
download_url_path: "url"
# No psadt.install or psadt.uninstall needed: NAPT generates them from the manifest
psadt:
app_vars:
AppName: "Slack"
AppVersion: "{{discovered_version}}"
- Validate and test:
What makes MSIX different:
- No
psadt.install/psadt.uninstallneeded - NAPT auto-generates commands from the MSIX manifest based onintune.run_as_account - No
intune.detectionneeded - Detection queries the AppX package database by identity name (not registry scanning); the store queried matchesintune.run_as_account - Architecture auto-detected - Extracted from
ProcessorArchitecturein the MSIX manifest RequireAdminauto-defaulted - Defaults tofalseforrun_as_account: "user"since per-user installs don't require elevation
Choosing install scope:
Use intune.run_as_account to control whether the install is provisioned for
all users or installed for the current user only:
intune:
run_as_account: "system" # Default: provisioned (all users)
# run_as_account: "user" # Per-user install
Overriding auto-generated commands:
Only needed for non-standard cases such as license files.
Set override_msix_commands: true:
psadt:
override_msix_commands: true
install: |
Add-AppxProvisionedPackage -Online -PackagePath "$($adtSession.DirFiles)\app.msix" -LicensePath "$($adtSession.DirFiles)\license.xml" -SkipLicense
uninstall: |
Get-AppxProvisionedPackage -Online | Where-Object { $_.DisplayName -eq "Vendor.App" } | Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage -Online
Create a recipe for a fixed download URL
Use this when the vendor has a stable download URL (like Chrome enterprise MSI).
Example: Google Chrome
- Create the recipe file:
# recipes/Google/chrome.yaml
apiVersion: napt/v1
name: "Google Chrome"
id: "napt-chrome"
discovery:
strategy: url_download
url: "https://dl.google.com/dl/chrome/install/googlechromestandaloneenterprise64.msi"
psadt:
app_vars:
AppName: "Google Chrome"
AppVersion: "{{discovered_version}}"
- Validate and test:
What to customize:
url: Direct download URL (must be stable, not version-specific)app_vars: Application name and other PSADT variables
Note: MSI installers supply their own version and install/uninstall commands; see the 7-Zip example above.
Handle authentication tokens
Many discovery APIs require a token.
Environment variables (recommended)
-
Set token in environment:
-
Reference in recipe:
-
In CI/CD, use secrets:
Recipe-level tokens (less secure)
If you must store tokens in recipes (not recommended for production):
discovery:
strategy: api_github
repo: "owner/repo"
token: "ghp_your_token_here" # Not recommended - use env vars instead
Test recipes before production
Run this before shipping a new or edited recipe.
-
Syntax validation:
-
Test discovery:
-
Verify downloaded file:
-
Test build:
-
Verify build structure:
-
Test packaging:
-
Verify .intunewin file:
Deploy to Intune
Upload a packaged app to Microsoft Intune. Requires napt package to have run first.
App registration setup (one time per organization)
Fastest path, as at least an Application Administrator:
napt auth setup --tenant-id "<Directory (tenant) ID>" # portal-free
# Also trust a CI platform through OIDC (GitHub Actions, main branch shown):
napt auth setup --tenant-id "<Directory (tenant) ID>" \
--federated-issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com \
--federated-subject repo:owner/intune-apps:ref:refs/heads/main
To do it by hand, follow
App Registration Setup in the user
guide (or run napt auth setup ... --print-only for the checklist).
Developer setup (one time)
Sign in once with the IDs from the app registration:
On Windows the OS account picker opens; elsewhere your browser does.
The IDs are remembered, so later sessions are just napt auth login, and
napt upload / napt promote run silently until the session expires.
napt auth status shows the account, tenant, and permissions in use;
napt auth logout clears the session.
CI/CD setup (one time)
Prefer OIDC federation when your platform supports it (GitHub Actions does):
add a federated credential to the app registration and let azure/login
mint the token, so there is no secret to store or rotate.
See App registration setup.
# GitHub Actions example; the federated credential is scoped to the
# "intune" environment, so only jobs that declare it receive tokens
permissions:
id-token: write
contents: read
jobs:
upload:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
environment: intune
steps:
- uses: azure/login@v2
with:
client-id: ${{ secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_ID }}
tenant-id: ${{ secrets.AZURE_TENANT_ID }}
allow-no-subscriptions: true
- name: Upload to Intune
run: napt upload recipes/Google/chrome.yaml
Otherwise create a client secret (Certificates & secrets > New client secret), store the client ID, tenant ID, and secret as pipeline secrets, and pass them as environment variables:
- name: Upload to Intune
env:
AZURE_CLIENT_ID: ${{ secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_ID }}
AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET: ${{ secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET }}
AZURE_TENANT_ID: ${{ secrets.AZURE_TENANT_ID }}
run: napt upload recipes/Google/chrome.yaml
The app registration must have the DeviceManagementApps.ReadWrite.All and
Group.Read.All Microsoft Graph application permissions.
Upload an app
Example output:
$ napt upload recipes/Google/chrome.yaml
Uploading package for recipe: /path/to/recipes/Google/chrome.yaml
[1/9] Locating .intunewin package...
[2/9] Authenticating with Azure...
[3/9] Parsing package metadata...
[4/9] Creating app record for 'Google Chrome'...
[UPLOAD] Created Intune app: <app id>
[5/9] Uploading to Azure Blob Storage...
[6/9] Committing content version...
[7/9] Creating app record for '[Update] Google Chrome'...
[UPLOAD] Created Intune app: <update id>
[8/9] Uploading to Azure Blob Storage...
[9/9] Committing content version...
======================================================================
UPLOAD RESULTS
======================================================================
App ID: napt-chrome
App Name: Google Chrome
Version: <version>
Intune Win32 App ID: <app id>
Intune Win32 Update ID: <update id>
Package: /path/to/packages/napt-chrome/<version>/Invoke-AppDeployToolkit.intunewin
Status: success
======================================================================
[SUCCESS] Package uploaded to Intune successfully!
With the default intune.build_types: "both", the install entry and the
[Update] entry are each created, uploaded, and committed (nine steps).
app_only or update_only runs six.
Full pipeline example
# 1. Check for new version (skips download if unchanged)
napt discover recipes/Google/chrome.yaml
# 2. Build PSADT package
napt build recipes/Google/chrome.yaml
# 3. Create .intunewin package
napt package recipes/Google/chrome.yaml
# 4. Upload to Intune
napt upload recipes/Google/chrome.yaml
Override publisher and description
By default, the publisher is inferred from the vendor directory name
(e.g., recipes/Google/ → "Google"). Override per-recipe with the
intune: section:
apiVersion: napt/v1
name: "Google Chrome"
id: "napt-chrome"
discovery:
strategy: url_download
url: "https://dl.google.com/..."
intune:
publisher: "Google LLC"
description: "Google Chrome browser for enterprise deployment."
privacy_url: "https://policies.google.com/privacy"
info_url: "https://chromeenterprise.google"
psadt:
# ... rest of recipe
Override upload behavior
Control how Intune handles installation, restarts, and script execution
per-recipe using the intune: section.
All fields have defaults and can also be set in defaults/org.yaml for
org-wide policy.
intune:
# Run installer and scripts as the logged-in user instead of SYSTEM.
# Required for apps that install into the user profile. Default: "system".
run_as_account: "user"
# Suppress any device restart after install (useful for background updates).
# Default: "basedOnReturnCode". Allowed: allow, suppress, force, basedOnReturnCode.
device_restart_behavior: "suppress"
# Increase timeout for large or slow installers. Default: 60.
max_run_time_minutes: 120
# Feature the app in Company Portal. Default: false.
is_featured: true
# Prevent self-service uninstall from Company Portal. Default: true.
allow_available_uninstall: false
# Require scripts to be code-signed before Intune will run them. Default: false.
enforce_signature_check: true
# Run installer and scripts in a 32-bit PowerShell context. Default: false.
run_as_32_bit: true
See recipe-reference.md for all allowed values.
Require recorded releases before upload
For review-gated publish workflows, make napt upload refuse anything that
was not recorded at discovery.
Set once in defaults/org.yaml:
For a legitimate manual upload under this policy, run napt discover first.
See require_pending for exact
behavior.
Promote updates through rings
Roll updates out gradually: pilot devices first, everyone else after the release has proven itself.
- Define rings once in
defaults/org.yaml(groups are Entra ID display names or object IDs):
deployment:
rings:
- name: "pilot"
groups: ["Pilot Devices"]
promote_after_days: 2
- name: "production"
groups: ["Production Devices"]
install:
intent: "available"
groups: ["All Users"]
- Plan: compute what is eligible (read-only):
A newly uploaded release starts its rollout in the first ring; a
release that has held its ring for promote_after_days is promoted to
the next.
The same plan also points new installs (the install entry) at the new
release, so net-new devices get it as soon as the first ring does.
Eligible actions are written per app to state/plans/<app-id>.json;
review the files, or commit them and gate the apply on a pull request.
Every action opens with a plain-English summary sentence and carries
the details behind it (the release, the groups it will assign, the
version it displaces, and for a promotion out of a held ring, when the
release entered it and the ring's bake threshold) so the files read
as the review record.
- Apply: execute the plan against Intune:
Ring groups are assigned to the release's [Update] entry as required
installs; the displaced older release is unassigned and retired per
deployment.retain_versions.
Each app's plan file is consumed after that app applies fully, and one
app's failure keeps its plan file for retry without blocking the rest.
Every apply also prints a drift check: discrepancies between
deployment state and Intune (removed assignments, admin-made changes,
stray apps) are warned about, never corrected.
Use napt promote plan --check-drift for the same report without
applying anything.
Both commands also fail fast on a group typo or deleted Entra ID
group: an authenticated plan refuses to write plans that name an
unresolvable group, and apply checks every group an app's plan is
about to assign before touching that app, so a bad group fails that
app with zero changes instead of a half-applied plan.
Run napt status to see where every app stands.
Run plan and apply on a schedule and promotion becomes automatic: each
release baked long enough moves one ring further on the next run.
A ring without promote_after_days is a manual gate; releases hold it
until you change the configuration.
Set a custom app icon
napt build extracts an icon from the installer to icons/{id}.png
automatically, and napt upload sends it to Intune.
Most apps need no configuration.
When extraction finds no usable icon (the build prints a warning), or you want a different image, you have two options:
Option 1: Set logo_path in the recipe (recommended)
The icon file lives in the recipe repo, so the fix travels to every
machine.
logo_path always wins over the icons directory and disables extraction
for that recipe.
Use a 256x256 PNG or JPEG under 700KB for best results in Company Portal.
Option 2: Drop a PNG into the icons directory
NAPT never overwrites a file in icons/, so this survives future builds
on this machine but does not travel with the repo (the directory is
gitignored).
Delete the file and rebuild to force re-extraction.
Fix a broken published app
You published an app, installs are failing: a bad install command, wrong detection settings, a missing PSADT step. You fixed the recipe, and now Intune needs to match.
The fix: delete the broken app and publish fresh.
Intune throttles retries after repeated failures (the Global Retry Schedule), and republishing content to the same app does not reliably reset it. A fresh app object gets a clean evaluation on every device:
- Delete the broken app entries (install and
[Update]) in the Intune portal. Deleting first matters: NAPT recognizes its own apps by their provenance stamp, so re-running upload against the existing broken app would adopt it instead of creating a new one. - Rebuild and upload: Upload finds no stamped apps, creates fresh entries, and records the new app IDs in deployment state automatically.
- Recreate the assignments the old app had.
If the vendor has shipped a newer version since the broken publish, you can also just run the normal pipeline; the new release creates new app entries anyway, and the broken version's entries can be deleted.
Exception: no device has attempted the install yet.
If you caught the problem before any assignment took effect (the app is still unassigned, or you spotted a wrong command during portal review), there is no retry throttling to escape, and an in-place fix is faster:
napt build recipes/Vendor/app.yaml
napt package recipes/Vendor/app.yaml
napt upload recipes/Vendor/app.yaml --force
--force updates the existing app entries in place (metadata and a fresh
content version together) and keeps the app IDs.
It never creates duplicates.
Automate NAPT with GitHub Actions
NAPT performs no git or CI operations itself: it reads and writes deterministic files and leaves the choreography to your pipeline. What follows is a review-gated flow on GitHub Actions. Adapt names, schedules, and branch rules to your org.
The model. Two PR streams gate everything:
- Publish PRs (one per app):
napt discoverrecords a pending release instate/deployment/<id>.json; CI opens a per-app PR with that diff. The title carries the decision (Publish Google Chrome 140.0.7339.128) and the body is a generated fact sheet: version, currently published version, installer URL, SHA-256, what merging does, and how to hold or reject. Merging approves the release: a workflow builds, packages, and uploads it, with the hash gate guaranteeing the approved binary is exactly what ships. - Promotion PRs (one, batched):
napt promote planwrites onestate/plans/<id>.jsonfile per app with that app's eligible promotions; CI commits them to a branch and opens a PR whose body opens with a risk line (**This plan:** 2 to pilot, 1 to production), lists every app's plan summaries and the run's drift warnings, and carries apromotes-to-productionlabel when the final ring is targeted. Merging approves the promotions: a workflow runsnapt promote apply, which executes each app's plan as an allowlist, independently. To hold one app's promotions, delete its plan file in the PR; the next scheduled plan will re-propose it, and the other apps merge and apply unaffected.
Writeback commits. After upload and apply, NAPT has recorded new
facts (Intune app IDs, ring positions) in the working tree that must
reach main, so those workflows push a [skip ci] commit.
Two consequences to set up once:
- The workflow identity needs permission to push to
main, either allow the Actions bot through branch protection or use a bot/app token with bypass rights. [skip ci]keeps the writeback from re-triggering workflows.
Secrets. AZURE_CLIENT_ID and AZURE_TENANT_ID for the app
registration, plus either a federated credential (OIDC, recommended; swap
the env: block in the examples below for an azure/login step) or
AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET
(see App Registration Setup).
Recommended org.yaml hardening:
Workflow 1: discover (opens publish PRs)
name: discover
on:
schedule:
- cron: "0 6 * * *"
workflow_dispatch:
permissions:
contents: write
pull-requests: write
jobs:
discover:
runs-on: windows-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: "3.13"
- run: pip install napt
- name: Restore installers from the last run
uses: actions/cache/restore@v4
with:
path: downloads
key: installers-
restore-keys: installers-
- name: Discover all recipes
shell: bash
# Actions' `shell: bash` runs with -e, so an unguarded loop would
# end at the first failing recipe (a vendor outage, a version the
# pattern cannot handle) and silently skip every recipe after it.
# Failures are collected instead, the successful apps still get
# their PRs below, and the last step fails the job.
run: |
: > discover-failures.txt
git ls-files 'recipes/*.yaml' 'recipes/**/*.yaml' | while read -r recipe; do
napt discover "$recipe" || {
echo "::error::napt discover failed for $recipe"
echo "$recipe" >> discover-failures.txt
}
done
- name: Cache installers for publish and the next discover
uses: actions/cache/save@v4
with:
path: downloads
key: installers-${{ github.run_id }}
- name: Open one PR per app with a new pending release
shell: bash
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
run: |
git config user.name "napt-bot"
git config user.email "napt-bot@users.noreply.github.com"
# Stage first so brand-new (untracked) state files are seen too
git add state/deployment
changed=$(git diff --cached --name-only -- state/deployment)
[ -z "$changed" ] && exit 0
# Writes pr-body.md and prints the PR title for one app's
# state file. The title is the decision (imperative, display
# name + version); the body layers facts, then what merging
# does, then how to say no.
pr_meta() {
python - "$1" <<'PY'
import json
import subprocess
import sys
from pathlib import Path
state_path = Path(sys.argv[1])
state = json.loads(state_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
# The state file names its app; the filename backstops a
# file saved before any name was recorded.
name = state.get("name") or state_path.stem
pending = state.get("pending")
published = state.get("published") or {}
if pending is None:
# Discovery cleared the pending slot: the vendor serves
# the already-published release. The diff only records it.
Path("pr-body.md").write_text(
f"**Name:** {name}\n\n"
"Discovery found the vendor serving the already-"
"published release, so this diff only clears the "
"app's pending slot. Merging records that; nothing "
"is published.\n",
encoding="utf-8",
)
print(f"Clear pending release for {name}")
raise SystemExit
current = published.get("version") or "none - first deployment"
# Ask napt whether the new version is lower than the published
# one. It orders versions exactly as the detection script on a
# device does, so the workflow never carries its own copy.
status = json.loads(
subprocess.run(
["napt", "status", "--format", "json"],
capture_output=True, text=True, check=True,
).stdout
)
row = next(r for r in status if r["app_id"] == state_path.stem)
warning = suffix = ""
if row["pending_is_downgrade"]:
suffix = f" (downgrade from {current})"
warning = (
f"**This is a downgrade:** {pending['version']} is "
f"lower than the published {current}. Devices already "
f"on {current} will not move to it; merging changes "
"what new installs get.\n\n"
)
Path("pr-body.md").write_text(
f"{warning}"
f"**Name:** {name}\n"
f"**New version:** {pending['version']}\n"
f"**Currently published:** {current}\n"
f"**Installer:** {pending['url']}\n"
f"**SHA-256:** `{pending['sha256']}`\n"
"\n"
"**Merging approves this exact binary.** The publish "
"workflow builds, packages, and uploads it; the upload "
"hash gate refuses any file that does not match the "
"SHA-256 above.\n"
"\n"
"**To hold:** leave this PR open - nothing ships until "
"it merges.\n"
"**Closing is not a durable rejection:** the next "
"discover run re-proposes the release, and a newer "
"vendor release replaces this PR's content "
"automatically.\n",
encoding="utf-8",
)
print(f"Publish {name} {pending['version']}{suffix}")
PY
}
# Snapshot all changes on a temp branch, then carve out one
# branch per app so each PR reviews exactly one state file.
git checkout -b napt/discover-snapshot
git commit -m "temp: discovery snapshot"
for f in $changed; do
app=$(basename "$f" .json)
git checkout -B "napt/discover-$app" origin/main
git checkout napt/discover-snapshot -- "$f"
git commit -m "feat: Record pending release for $app"
git push -f origin "napt/discover-$app"
title=$(pr_meta "$f")
# Refresh the title and body on every force-push so a
# superseding release never leaves a stale decision open.
gh pr create --head "napt/discover-$app" \
--title "$title" --body-file pr-body.md \
|| gh pr edit "napt/discover-$app" \
--title "$title" --body-file pr-body.md
done
- name: Fail the run if any recipe failed to discover
shell: bash
run: |
[ -s discover-failures.txt ] || exit 0
echo "Discovery failed for:"
cat discover-failures.txt
exit 1
One recipe's failure does not hold up the others: the discover step records it, the PR step still opens publish PRs for every app that did discover a new release, and the final step fails the run so the failure is not missed. Each failed recipe is also annotated on the run summary.
Workflow 2: publish (on merge of a publish PR)
name: publish
on:
push:
branches: [main]
paths: ["state/deployment/**"]
# Serializes publish runs (bursts of merges dedupe to the newest run).
# Deliberately NOT shared with promote-apply: a merge that touches both
# deployment state and the plan file triggers both workflows, and runs
# sharing a group cancel each other instead of queueing.
concurrency: napt-publish
permissions:
contents: write
jobs:
publish:
runs-on: windows-latest
env:
AZURE_CLIENT_ID: ${{ secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_ID }}
AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET: ${{ secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET }}
AZURE_TENANT_ID: ${{ secrets.AZURE_TENANT_ID }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: "3.13"
- run: pip install napt
- name: Restore cached installers
uses: actions/cache/restore@v4
with:
path: downloads
key: installers-
restore-keys: installers-
- name: Publish every app with an approved pending release
shell: bash
run: |
git ls-files 'recipes/*.yaml' 'recipes/**/*.yaml' | while read -r recipe; do
id=$(python -c "import sys, yaml; print(yaml.safe_load(open(sys.argv[1], encoding='utf-8'))['id'])" "$recipe")
state="state/deployment/$id.json"
[ -f "$state" ] || continue
pending=$(python -c "import json, sys; print(json.load(open(sys.argv[1], encoding='utf-8')).get('pending') is not None)" "$state")
[ "$pending" = "True" ] || continue
# Use the cached installer when its hash matches the approved
# release; otherwise fetch from the vendor. --stateless keeps
# the approved pending untouched, and napt build refuses any
# file that does not match it. Downloads are filed by version
# (downloads/<id>/<version>/<file>), hence the two-level glob.
psha=$(python -c "import json, sys; print(json.load(open(sys.argv[1], encoding='utf-8'))['pending']['sha256'])" "$state")
if ! sha256sum "downloads/$id/"*/* 2>/dev/null | grep -q "^$psha "; then
napt discover "$recipe" --stateless
# Fail fast when the vendor no longer serves the approved
# binary (napt build would refuse it anyway).
sha256sum "downloads/$id/"*/* 2>/dev/null | grep -q "^$psha " || {
echo "::error::$id: vendor no longer serves the approved release ($psha); the approval is stranded until a new discover PR supersedes it"
exit 1
}
fi
napt build "$recipe"
napt package "$recipe"
napt upload "$recipe"
done
- name: Write back recorded app IDs
shell: bash
run: |
git config user.name "napt-bot"
git config user.email "napt-bot@users.noreply.github.com"
git add state/deployment
git diff --cached --quiet && exit 0
git commit -m "chore: Record published releases [skip ci]"
# main may have advanced while this run published (more merges,
# another workflow's writeback). State files are per-app, so a
# rebase cannot conflict.
for attempt in 1 2 3; do
git push && exit 0
git pull --rebase origin main
done
git push
Why the installer cache steps matter. Without them, the publish runner re-downloads from the vendor, which couples an already-approved publish to the vendor still serving that exact binary; a pulled or replaced file strands the approval at the hash gate. The cache steps above hand the publish runner the very binary that was reviewed; the sha256 check in the loop falls back to a fresh download when the cache is stale or evicted (GitHub evicts caches unused for about a week), so the flow degrades gracefully. This is safe by construction: the upload hash gate validates whatever binary the runner provides, so a cache can never ship the wrong bytes.
The restore step in the discover workflow serves a second purpose:
bandwidth.
napt discover skips the download when the installer has not changed;
Skipping downloads explains how.
Everything it consults lives in downloads/, and a fresh runner starts
without it, so restoring downloads/ from the last run is what lets the
scheduled discover skip re-downloading installers that have not changed,
which adds up quickly for recipe sets full of large installers.
Keep the path values of the save and restore steps identical:
actions/cache makes the path list part of the cache version, so a
mismatch reads as a silent cache miss.
For long-lived archival (including installers for retained releases the
vendor no longer serves) replace the cache steps with an object store
(S3, Azure Blob) or a self-hosted runner with a persistent downloads/
directory.
Workflow 3: promotion plan (opens the promotion PR)
name: promote-plan
on:
schedule:
- cron: "0 7 * * *"
workflow_dispatch:
permissions:
contents: write
pull-requests: write
jobs:
plan:
runs-on: windows-latest
env:
AZURE_CLIENT_ID: ${{ secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_ID }}
AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET: ${{ secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET }}
AZURE_TENANT_ID: ${{ secrets.AZURE_TENANT_ID }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: "3.13"
- run: pip install napt
- name: Plan promotions (with drift report and writeback recovery)
shell: bash
# tee keeps the log so the PR body below can carry the drift
# warnings. Actions' `shell: bash` runs with -eo pipefail, so
# napt's exit code survives the pipe.
run: napt promote plan --check-drift --reconcile | tee plan.log
- name: Open or update the promotion PR
shell: bash
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
run: |
# git status sees untracked files (a first-ever plan) too.
# Watch all of state/: --reconcile may have repaired a
# deployment state file whose publish writeback was lost.
[ -z "$(git status --porcelain -- state)" ] && exit 0
git config user.name "napt-bot"
git config user.email "napt-bot@users.noreply.github.com"
git checkout -B napt/promote-plan origin/main
git add state
git commit -m "feat: Plan ring promotions"
git push -f origin napt/promote-plan
# Writes pr-body.md from the plan files themselves: the risk
# line first, then each app's action summaries (the same
# sentences NAPT wrote into the files), the hold instruction,
# and the plan run's drift warnings. Prints "production" when
# the plan assigns the final ring (ring policy is org-wide,
# so the last ring comes from org.yaml).
label=$(python - <<'PY'
import json
from pathlib import Path
import yaml
org = yaml.safe_load(
Path("defaults/org.yaml").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
) or {}
rings = [r["name"] for r in org.get("deployment", {}).get("rings", [])]
last_ring = rings[-1] if rings else None
counts = {}
assigns = 0
stanzas = []
final_ring_hit = False
for path in sorted(Path("state/plans").glob("*.json")):
plan = json.loads(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
lines = [f"**{plan['name']}** (`{plan['app_id']}`)"]
for action in plan["actions"]:
lines.append(f"- {action['summary']}")
if action["type"] == "promote":
counts[action["ring"]] = counts.get(action["ring"], 0) + 1
if action["ring"] == last_ring:
final_ring_hit = True
else:
assigns += 1
stanzas.append("\n".join(lines))
ordered = [r for r in rings if r in counts]
ordered += [r for r in counts if r not in rings]
bits = [f"{counts[r]} to {r}" for r in ordered]
if assigns:
bits.append(f"{assigns} install assignment(s)")
risk = ", ".join(bits) if bits else (
"no ring changes - this refresh carries recovered "
"deployment state only"
)
drift = []
in_section = False
for line in Path("plan.log").read_text(encoding="utf-8").splitlines():
if "DRIFT CHECK" in line:
in_section = True
elif in_section and "[WARNING]" in line:
drift.append("- " + line.split("[WARNING]", 1)[1].strip())
parts = [f"**This plan:** {risk}"]
if stanzas:
parts.extend(stanzas)
parts.append(
"**Merging approves and applies every action above.**"
)
parts.append(
"**To hold one app:** delete its "
"`state/plans/<app-id>.json` file from this PR - the "
"other apps apply unaffected, and the next plan run "
"re-proposes whatever is still eligible."
)
if drift:
parts.append(
"**Drift warnings** (deployment state vs. the tenant "
"at plan time):\n" + "\n".join(drift)
)
Path("pr-body.md").write_text(
"\n\n".join(parts) + "\n", encoding="utf-8"
)
print("production" if final_ring_hit else "")
PY
)
# Title stays generic and stable (only one promotion PR is
# ever open; title churn breaks email threading) - the risk
# signal lives in the body's first line and the label.
gh pr create --head napt/promote-plan \
--title "Promotion plan" --body-file pr-body.md \
|| gh pr edit napt/promote-plan --body-file pr-body.md
if [ "$label" = "production" ]; then
gh label create promotes-to-production \
--description "This plan assigns the final ring" \
--color D93F0B --force
gh pr edit napt/promote-plan --add-label promotes-to-production
else
gh pr edit napt/promote-plan \
--remove-label promotes-to-production || true
fi
Workflow 4: promotion apply (on merge of the promotion PR)
name: promote-apply
on:
push:
branches: [main]
paths: ["state/plans/**"]
# Own group (not shared with publish) - see the publish workflow's
# concurrency comment.
concurrency: napt-promote-apply
permissions:
contents: write
jobs:
apply:
runs-on: windows-latest
env:
AZURE_CLIENT_ID: ${{ secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_ID }}
AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET: ${{ secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET }}
AZURE_TENANT_ID: ${{ secrets.AZURE_TENANT_ID }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: "3.13"
- run: pip install napt
# Apply exits 1 when any app's plan fails, but other apps may
# have applied; continue so the writeback records their ring
# positions and consumed plans; a final step fails the run.
- name: Apply the approved plans
id: apply
continue-on-error: true
run: napt promote apply
- name: Write back ring positions and consume the plans
shell: bash
run: |
git config user.name "napt-bot"
git config user.email "napt-bot@users.noreply.github.com"
git add state
git diff --cached --quiet && exit 0
git commit -m "chore: Record applied promotions [skip ci]"
# Same rebase-and-retry as the publish writeback.
for attempt in 1 2 3; do
git push && exit 0
git pull --rebase origin main
done
git push
- name: Surface a failed apply
if: steps.apply.outcome == 'failure'
run: exit 1
Notes:
- Promotions merged but applied later are always safe: bake time only grows, and apply validates every entry against current state anyway.
- Apply treats each app's plan file as an independent unit: a failure
(an unresolvable group, a Graph error) fails that app, keeps its plan
file on
mainfor the next apply, and never blocks the other apps, which is why the writeback above runs even when the apply step fails. - Resolving a failed app depends on the failure class. A transient Graph error needs no fix: re-run the apply workflow; already-applied actions skip, the rest complete, and the plan file is consumed. An unresolvable group needs the configuration fixed (or the Entra ID group restored) and then a re-plan, not just a re-run: plan files bake in group names at plan time, so the fix reaches Intune when the next scheduled plan regenerates the file and the promotion PR carries the corrected plan. Until then, apply keeps failing that one app, and only that one. A corrupted state file restores from git history like any other committed file.
- All four workflows are idempotent: re-running any of them converges to the same result (upload adopts existing apps, apply skips already-applied actions).
- A publish whose writeback push fails (branch protection, a crashed
runner) self-heals: the next plan run's
--reconcilere-records the publication from tenant evidence, the promotion PR carries the repair, and the recovered release is planned for its first ring in the same run. Re-running the failed publish also converges, just sooner. windows-latestrunners are required fornapt package(IntuneWinAppUtil.exe is Windows-only). The discover workflow alone could run on Linux withmsitoolsinstalled, since discover reads the version out of every MSI it downloads.
Share a base recipe between apps
When several recipes differ only in a few fields, put the shared part in
one file and name it as the parent of each app recipe.
-
Write the base recipe. It is a complete recipe; keep it out of the vendor folders so NAPT never runs it on its own:
-
Write each app as a child that sets only what differs. Name it
<app>.override.yaml: -
Validate the child. The output names the parent it merged:
Run every command against the child, never the base. The merge order and list behavior are in Configuration layers.
Update existing recipes
When a recipe needs changes (new version format, different download URL, etc.).
-
Edit the recipe file.
-
Validate and test it the same way as a new recipe: see Test recipes before production.
Troubleshoot discovery failures
Common issues and solutions when napt discover fails.
Issue: "Unknown discovery strategy"
Problem: Recipe uses a strategy that doesn't exist or isn't registered.
Solution:
-
Check strategy name spelling (must be:
api_github,api_json,url_download, orweb_scrape) -
Validate recipe:
napt validate recipes/App/app.yaml -
Check for typos in strategy configuration
Issue: "Version extraction failed"
Problem: NAPT can't extract version from the downloaded file or API response.
Solution:
- Use
--debugto see what NAPT is trying to parse:
-
For MSI files, verify the file is a valid MSI
-
For
api_json, check thatversion_pathpoints to the correct JSON field -
For
web_scrape, verifyversion_patternregex matches the URL format
Issue: "GitHub API rate limit"
Problem: Using api_github without authentication hits rate limits.
Solution:
- Create a GitHub personal access token
- Add to recipe:
- Set
GITHUB_TOKENin your environment (see Handle authentication tokens)
Issue: "Download failed" or "Network error"
Problem: Can't download the installer file.
Solution:
-
Check URL is accessible:
curl -I <url>or open in browser -
Verify authentication if required (API tokens, headers)
-
Check network connectivity and firewall rules
-
Use
--verboseto see HTTP request/response details
Issue: discover reuses an installer you want downloaded again
Problem: napt discover reports that the version is already downloaded
(or File not modified) and you want a fresh copy.
Solution:
The downloads folder is disposable: delete the app's folder and rediscover.
Issue: "Deployment state corrupted"
Problem: A file under state/deployment/ has invalid JSON.
Solution:
Deployment state files are authoritative and are never auto-replaced. Fix the JSON or restore the file from version control.
To run discovery once without reading or writing deployment state, use
--stateless:
Issue: MSI version extraction fails on Linux/macOS
Problem: napt discover or napt build cannot read the MSI ProductVersion
on a non-Windows machine.
Solution: Install msitools, which provides the msiinfo backend:
sudo apt-get install msitools # Debian/Ubuntu
sudo dnf install msitools # RHEL/Fedora
brew install msitools # macOS
What's next?
- User Guide - Deep dive into discovery strategies, state management, and configuration
- Creating Recipes - Detailed strategy configuration guides
- Examples - Browse working recipe examples